§ 17‑104 provides the modern evidentiary pathway to trace slavery‑derived and Freedmen‑derived capital into successor institutions, which directly supports the Descendant Class’s inheritance claims to the diverted res (original trust property) of the Freedmen’s Bank trust.​​

Legal Basis for Tracing Diverted Freedmen’s Bank Assets Through § 17‑104 Slavery Era Disclosure

Philadelphia Code § 17‑104 (Slavery Era Business Disclosure) provides a legally sufficient and evidentiary foundation for identifying successor financial institutions, that hold or benefited from assets traceable to the Freedmen’s Bank trust corpus (“the diverted res”). 

Congress established the Freedmen’s Bank in 1864–65 as a statutory trust, not a commercial bank. The beneficiary class was expressly defined as freedmen (persons emancipated) and their descendants, creating a closed, slave-lineage‑based class whose equitable interests persist unless expressly terminated by statute. To date, no such termination ever occurred. Deposits, interest earnings, federal guarantees, and associated financial instruments formed the trust res, which Congress acknowledged was mismanaged and diverted into private banks and Treasury accounts following the Bank’s collapse in 1874. Because the Freedmen’s Bank operated as a trust, the assets transferred into private institutions after 1874 -- were not extinguished; they were diverted. Under trust law, diverted assets remain subject to equitable claims by the beneficiary class, and those claims follow the property into any form it takes, including successor institutions created through mergers, acquisitions, or rechartering. Modern financial institutions that inherited slavery‑era or Freedmen‑era assets therefore hold property that is potentially subject to constructive trust conditions. 

Philadelphia Code § 17‑104 requires banks and corporations seeking City contracts to disclose: predecessor entities involved in slavery‑era commerce and insurance policies issued on enslaved persons i.e mergers, acquisitions, and corporate lineage connecting past entities to present institutions. These disclosures function as a municipal tracing mechanism, enabling the city to identify institutions whose historical predecessors either financed slavery or absorbed Freedmen’s Bank assets. This information is essential for establishing successor liability and for determining whether a modern institution holds or benefited from the diverted res.
​
Freedmen and their descendants retain equitable title. This chain provides a legally sound basis for the city to require enhanced disclosures, impose compliance obligations, and structure reinvestment requirements that reflect the ongoing fiduciary implications of the diverted res. Philadelphia can: identify institutions enriched by slavery‑era and Freedmen‑era capital snd assess whether those institutions hold assets subject to constructive trust principles. Condition city contracts on compliance with slave-lineage‑based equity measures support federal or municipal actions seeking accounting or restitution of the diverted res This approach positions Philadelphia as a national leader in enforcing Reconstruction‑era obligations through modern municipal authority.